cubic
AI code reviewer for GitHub pull requests that checks each change against the whole codebase and team rules, scores merge confidence, can auto-approve low-risk PRs and runs scheduled codebase scans for bugs.
About cubic
Human review becomes the bottleneck when teams and coding agents open more pull requests than senior engineers can read carefully.
Who it’s for
- Engineering teams on GitHub that want an automated first review on every pull request
- Teams that want past review comments turned into rules and coding agents to fix flagged issues
When to consider it
Consider cubic when you want PR reviews that look beyond the diff, enforce plain-English team rules and can auto-approve safe changes such as dependency or copy updates.
Tradeoffs & limitations
- Paid plans are per developer: Team is $30 a month billed yearly ($40 monthly) for 40,000 reviewed lines per developer, Pro $79 yearly ($99 monthly) and Max $160 yearly ($200 monthly); the free Starter plan is limited to 20 PR reviews a month.
- Codebase scans, fixes with coding agents and premium support start on Pro; open-source teams can use cubic for free.
SOTA overview · Documentation-based assessment · Sources & review method
Updates
No updates shared yet.
Discussion
Newest firstAsk a question or share how you use cubic.
Keep it helpful. Community rules
Loading discussion…
Sources & review method
Documentation-based assessment · Nov 3, 2026 · Prepared with AI assistance; not a hands-on benchmark.
Checked by SOTA · AI-assisted documentation review. Selection advice is our assessment; verify current requirements for your deployment.
Import history & original evidence
cubic official website
AI code reviewer for GitHub pull requests that checks each change against the whole codebase and team rules, scores merge confidence, can auto-approve low-risk PRs and runs scheduled codebase scans for bugs.
Based on official pages and announcements checked on 2026-11-02. No hands-on test, performance benchmark or popularity ranking is claimed.